FNIA Art. 80a - Detention order and detention review under the Dublin procedure

Einleitung zur Rechtsnorm FNIA:



Art. 80a FNIA from 2024

Art. 80a Foreign Nationals and Integration Act (FNIA) drucken

Art. 80a (1) Detention order and detention review under the Dublin procedure

1 The following authorities are responsible for issuing detention orders under Article 76a:

  • a. (2) in the case of persons accommodated in a federal centre: the canton responsible for enforcing removal under Article 46 paragraph 1bis third sentence AsylA (3) , and in other cases the canton in which the federal centre is located;
  • b. in the case of persons that have been allocated to a canton or resident in a canton who have not submitted an asylum application (Art. 64a): the canton concerned.

    • 2 ... (4)

    3 The legality and appropriateness of detention shall be reviewed at the request of the detainee by a judicial authority in a written procedure. This review may be requested at any time. (5)

    4 The detainee may apply for release from detention at any time. The judicial authority must decide on the application within eight working days in a written procedure.

    5 The detention of children and young persons under 15 years of age is not permitted.

    6 In the case of a detention order in respect of an unaccompanied minor seeking asylum, the representative under Article 64a paragraph 3bis of this Act or under Article 17 paragraph 3 AsylA will be informed in advance.

    7 The detention order shall be revoked if:

  • a. the reason for detention ceases to apply or the removal or expulsion order proves to be unenforceable for legal or practical reasons;
  • b. a request for release from detention is granted;
  • c. the detainee becomes subject to a custodial sentence or measure.

    • 8 When reviewing the decision to issue, extend or revoke a detention order, the judicial authority shall also take account of the detainee’s family circumstances and the circumstances behind the enforcement of detention.

    (1) Inserted by Annex No I 1 of the FD of 26 Sept. 2014 (Adoption of R[EU] No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection), in force since 1 July 2015 (AS 2015 1841; BBl 2014 2675).
    (2) Amended by No I of the FA of 14 Dec. 2018 (Procedural Regulations and Information Systems), in force since 1 June 2019 (AS 2019 1413; BBl 2018 1685).
    (3) SR 142.31
    (4) Repealed by Annex No 1 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2015, with effect from 1 March 2019 (AS 2016 3101, 2018 2855; BBl 2014 7991).
    (5) Amended by Annex No 1 of the FA of 25 Sept. 2015, in force since 1 March 2019 (AS 2016 3101, 2018 2855; BBl 2014 7991).
    Es besteht kein Anspruch auf Aktualität und Vollständigkeit/Richtigkeit.
    Wollen Sie werbefrei und mehr Einträge sehen? Hier geht es zur Registrierung.

    Art. 80a Foreign Nationals and Integration Act (AIG) - Anwendung bei den Gerichten

    Anwendung im Kantonsgericht

    Dieser Gesetzesartikel wurde bei folgenden kantonalen Gerichtsentscheiden referenziert/angewendet (nicht abschliessend):

    KantonFallnummerLeitsatz/StichwortSchlagwörter
    GRSK2 2021 61Überprüfung der Dublin-HaftRecht; Verfahren; Graubünden; Verfahren; Schweiz; Vorinstanz; Person; Entscheid; Wegweisung; Frist; Zwangsmassnahmengericht; Einreise; Kanton; Einreiseverbot; Beschwerdeverfahren; Dublin-Haft; Verbeiständung; Beschwerdeführers; Stunden; Dublin-Verfahren; Rechtsprechung; Haftgr; Schwierigkeit; Rechtspflege; Anzeichen; Ausschaffung; Voraussetzung

    Anwendung im Verwaltungsgericht

    KantonFallnummerLeitsatz/StichwortSchlagwörter
    BSAUS.2024.17-Beurteilte; Verfahren; Migration; Migrationsamt; Basel; Wegweisung; Schweiz; Vorbereitung; Vorbereitungs; Verfahrens; Vorbereitungshaft; Basel-Stadt; Dublin-Verfahren; Ausländer; Überprüfung; Person; Behörde; Woche; Entscheid; Einreise; Wochen; Deutschland; Belgien; Beurteilten; Anordnung; Dublin-Verfahrens; Einzelrichter
    BSAUS.2023.40-Überprüfung; Basel; Antrag; Verfahren; Vorbereitungshaft; Basel-Stadt; Ausländer; Migration; Migrationsamt; Beurteilte; Kantons; Einzelrichter; Zwangsmassnahmen; Ausländerrecht; Dublin-Verfahren; Bundesgericht; Gesetzes; Honorar; Appellationsgericht; Dublin-Verfahrens; Verwaltungsgericht; Marokko; Verfügung; Rechtmässigkeit; Angemessenheit; Person; Behörde; Frist