| Canton: | ZH |
| Case number: | VB.2018.00217 |
| Instance: | Verwaltungsgericht |
| Department: | 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter |
| Date: | 23.07.2018 |
| Force of law: | Das Bundesgericht ist auf eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 01.10.2018 nicht eingetreten. |
| Summary: | A and her son B have been receiving financial support from the Social Services of the City of Zurich since June 2016. There were disputes about the consideration of premiums and rental costs in the support budget. A has objected to the decisions of the Social welfare Authority, but this has been rejected. Finally, she went to the administrative Court to challenge the decisions. The court ruled that A must look for a cheaper apartment, and the costs of additional insurance will not be covered. It was also stipulated that the rental costs are not automatically reduced, but only after the expiration of a period. The court costs were imposed on A. |
| Rule of Law: | - |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Jürg Bosshart, Martin Bertschi, Alain Griffel, Kommentar zum Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetz des Kantons Zürich, §19 N.7; §19a N.49 VRG, 2014 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.