| Canton: | ZH |
| Case number: | VB.2016.00483 |
| Instance: | Verwaltungsgericht |
| Department: | 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter |
| Date: | 16.08.2017 |
| Force of law: | Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. |
| Summary: | A has been holding the dog C since the beginning of 2015 and was asked to provide proof of expertise. After several correspondences, A was asked to provide the proof. A filed a complaint and demanded to be exempted from the obligation. The veterinary office canceled his order, but insisted on the costs. A again filed a complaint, which was dismissed. A filed an objection and demanded that the costs be covered by the state treasury. The administrative court decided that A must bear the costs, since he did not provide the proof on time. |
| Rule of Law: | - |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.