Jugement Verwaltungsgericht (ZH - VB.2016.00128)

Canton:	ZH
Case number:	VB.2016.00128

Instance:	Verwaltungsgericht
Department:	1. Abteilung/1. Kammer

Verwaltungsgericht Entscheid VB.2016.00128 vom 20.12.2017 (ZH)

Date:	20.12.2017
Force of law:	Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig.

Summary:	In 2009, the EAG submitted an application for a cost allocation procedure, which was carried out by the AWEL. After various decisions and complaints, it was determined that A should bear 80% of the costs and the CAG 20%. A filed a complaint, which was partially approved. The costs for preliminary investigation and monitoring are distributable, while the costs for the construction project and execution are not distributable. The appeal decision has been partially overturned, and the costs will be redistributed accordingly. The parties shall be subject to a pro rata fee. The court costs are borne by A, the CAG and the AWEL. There is no party compensation. The costs and compensation consequences for the appeal procedure will also be distributed accordingly.
Rule of Law:	-
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.