E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Plainte/2019/61)


Canton:VD
Case number:Plainte/2019/61
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Plainte/2019/61 vom 30.12.2019 (VD)
Date:30.12.2019
Force of law:-
Summary:The Cour des poursuites et faillites of the Cantonal Court has decided on an appeal of O.________ against the decision of the President of the District Court of La Côte to reject a second estimate in relation to a real estate seizure. O.________ had requested several extensions to make the advance payment for the estimate, which was considered delaying. Despite several extensions, the commissioned expert was not able to visit the property. The authority decided that the possibility of a second estimate should not be used for delaying purposes. The appeal of O.________ was rejected and the decision was confirmed.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 BGG;Art. 17 SchKG;Art. 18 SchKG;Art. 2 ZGB;Art. 20 OR;Art. 52 ZPO;Art. 9 OR;Art. 99 OR;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.