E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/97)


Canton:VD
Case number:ML/2020/97
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs
Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/97 vom 04.05.2020 (VD)
Date:04.05.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:G.________, a resident of St. Gallen, filed a complaint against a payment order from the debt enforcement authority of Nyon. The complaint was approved because the payment order was not sufficiently substantiated. The creditor must now issue a new order for payment, which contains the reasons for the claim. Here is the G.________ filed an appeal against a payment order. The complaint was approved because the payment order was not justified. The creditor must now issue a new payment order. The new payment order must contain the reasons for the claim. The operation will be continued. The summary contains the main information of the verdict: The party who filed the complaint The result of the complaint The rationale for the result The consequences of the verdict I tried to keep the summary as concise as possible, while not forgetting important information.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 105 CPC;Art. 107 CPC;Art. 321 CPC;Art. 326 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 80 LP;Art. 81 LP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.