Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/54)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	ML/2020/54

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs

Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/54 vom 08.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	08.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	On April 8, 2020, the Supreme Court of the Canton of Vaud confirmed the final annulment of A.G.________'s appeal against the debt collection by the Lavaux-Oron Debt Collection Office. The Debt enforcement Office had operated A.G.________ due to unpaid bills. A.G._______ had objected to the debt enforcement on the grounds that the claims of the debt enforcement office were unfounded. The High Court rejected the appeal of A.G.________ and confirmed the enforcement. A.G.________ must therefore settle the claims of the debt enforcement office. More detailed summary: On April 8, 2020, the High Court of the Canton of Vaud confirmed the decision of the Lavaux-Oron District Court of November 8, 2019, according to which the objection of A.G.________ against the debt collection by the Lavaux-Oron Debt Collection Office will be definitively annulled. A.G._______ had objected to the debt enforcement on the grounds that the claims of the debt enforcement office were unfounded. The district court rejected the appeal and confirmed the enforcement. A.G.________ has appealed against this judgment. The High Court rejected the appeal of A.G.________ and confirmed the enforcement. The High Court has found that the claims of the debt enforcement office are justified on the basis of unpaid invoices. A.G.________ must therefore settle the claims of the debt enforcement office. More details: The debt enforcement was objected to by A.G.________ on the grounds that the claims of the debt enforcement office were unfounded due to unpaid invoices for a service not rendered. The district court rejected the appeal and confirmed the enforcement. The district court has established that the claims of the debt enforcement office are justified on the basis of unpaid invoices for a service rendered. A.G.________ has appealed against this judgment. The High Court rejected the appeal of A.G.________ and confirmed the enforcement. The Higher Court has found that the claims of the debt enforcement office are justified on the basis of unpaid invoices for a service rendered. A.G.________ must therefore settle the claims of the debt enforcement office.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 144 CPC;Art. 321 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 80 LP;Art. 81 LP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.