| Summary: | On April 8, 2020, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court ruled that the opposition raised by A.T. against a debt collection by the Lavaux-Oron Debt Collection Office will be legally annulled.
A.T. had objected to the debt enforcement because she believed that the debt enforcement office's claim was unfounded.
However, the debt enforcement Office proved A.T.'s claim, so the Federal Court dismissed the opposition.
A.T. must therefore bear the costs of the operation.
The judgment is final and can no longer be appealed.
In another 5 sentences:
The Federal Court has confirmed the decision of the recovery office Lavaux-Oron that A.T. has a claim of CHF 10000.- has to pay to the debt enforcement office.
A.T. had denied the claim because she believed that she had already paid it.
However, the Federal Court found that A.T. did not settle the claim.
A.T. must therefore pay the claim to the debt collection office, as well as the costs of the debt collection.
The judgment is final and can no longer be appealed.
Which summary is better?
The first summary is shorter and contains the most important information. It is therefore suitable for a general overview. The second summary is more detailed and contains more details. It is therefore suitable for a more detailed analysis. |