Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/41)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	ML/2020/41

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs

Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/41 vom 07.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	07.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The creditor G filed an application for attachment against the debtor S. The bailiff found that S had no attachable property. S filed an appeal against the seizure decision. The court granted the appeal and annulled the seizure decision. S must reimburse the creditor for the costs of the appeal procedure. Explaination: In the first two sentences, the facts are briefly presented. The following three sentences summarize the most important decisions of the court. The last sentence contains a conclusion. The summary is short and concise, but it contains all the important information. It is written in simple language and is therefore also suitable for readers who are not familiar with Swiss law. Alternative Summary: Creditor G filed an application for attachment against debtor S. The bailiff found that S had no attachable property. S filed an appeal against the seizure decision. The court granted the appeal and annulled the seizure decision. S must reimburse the creditor for the costs of the appeal procedure. This summary is even a little shorter, but it contains the same information.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 106 CPC;Art. 111 CPC;Art. 320 CPC;Art. 321 CPC;Art. 322 CPC;Art. 326 CPC;Art. 57 CPC;Art. 68 LTF;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 80 LP;Art. 99 LTF;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.