Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/22)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	ML/2020/22

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs

Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/22 vom 26.02.2020 (VD)

Date:	26.02.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	E.________ Sàrl sued A.B._______, B.B.________ and C.B.________ for registration of a legal craftsman and entrepreneur mortgage on their property. The action was approved by the court of first instance, but the defendants appealed. The Court of Appeal upheld the judgment of the first instance and concluded that E.________ Sàrl had demonstrated that it had fulfilled its contractual obligations to the subcontractor T.________. The appeal was dismissed because the arguments of the appeal were not convincing and the E.________ Sàrl was able to prove that it had carried out its work and could make a claim. The defendants must bear the court costs.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 106 CPC;Art. 151 CPC;Art. 322 CPC;Art. 326 CPC;Art. 55 CC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 82 LP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.