E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/108)


Canton:VD
Case number:ML/2020/108
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs
Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/108 vom 05.06.2020 (VD)
Date:05.06.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:F.________ SA obtained the annulment of a seizure order. The plaintiff F.________ SA appealed against a seizure order of the defendant. The appellate instance considered the decision inadmissible, since the plaintiff had not made it sufficiently credible that the defendant had seizure-able assets. The plaintiff had the defendant on payment of CHF 10000.-- sue. The defendant had acknowledged the claim, but claimed that he had no attachable property. The appellate instance stated that the plaintiff had not made the defendant sufficiently credible that she had seizure-able assets. The defendant only claimed that he had no attachable property. The plaintiff, on the other hand, did not provide any specific information on the financial circumstances of the defendant. The plaintiff's appeal was therefore approved. The attachment order was repealed. The decision is final and final. (49 Words) Shorter summary: The attachment order has been revoked because the plaintiff has not made it sufficiently credible that the defendant has attachable assets. (24 Words)
Rule of Law:Art. 100 BGG;Art. 106 ZPO;Art. 142 ZPO;Art. 145 ZPO;Art. 2 ZGB;Art. 251 ZPO;Art. 31 SchKG;Art. 321 ZPO;Art. 322 ZPO;Art. 56 SchKG;Art. 62 SchKG;Art. 63 SchKG;Art. 74 BGG;Art. 82 SchKG;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.