Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2020/102)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	ML/2020/102

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs

Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2020/102 vom 06.05.2020 (VD)

Date:	06.05.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	K.________, a Swiss citizen, opposes the decision of the Justice of the Peace of the district of Jura-Nord vaudois and the district of Gros-de-Vaud, who ordered the final cessation of enforcement in his case. The Cour des poursuites et faillites of the Tribunal cantonal dismisses the appeal. K.________ did not prove that the foreclosure was inadmissible. The decision of the justice of the Peace remains in force. The costs of the legal dispute shall be borne by K.________. (49 Words) Explanation: The first sentence reflects the most important information about the case: the name of the complainant, his nationality and the type of decision he is appealing against. The second sentence summarizes the result of the appeal procedure. The third sentence gives the reason for the refusal of the appeal. The fourth sentence repeats the result of the appeal procedure. The fifth sentence regulates the costs of the litigation. Alternative: K.________, a Swiss citizen, opposes the cessation of compulsory execution in his case. The Cour des poursuites et faillites of the Tribunal cantonal dismisses the appeal. The decision of the justice of the Peace remains in force. (36 Words) This summary is a little shorter and contains only the most important information.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 106 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 80 LP;Art. 81 LP;Art. 88 LP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.