| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | ML/2019/251 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs |
| Date: | 31.12.2019 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The Cour des poursuites et faillites of the Cantonal Court deals with a legal dispute between D.________ SA and P.________ regarding a seizure. The court decision of July 11, 2019 was challenged because the delivery to the other party was not made correctly. The case is referred back to the judge of first instance to make a new decision. The court costs of the appellate instance are covered by the state, and the advance payment of the appellant is reimbursed. There is an opportunity to appeal against this verdict in the Federal Court. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 107 ZPO;Art. 138 ZPO;Art. 253 ZPO;Art. 321 ZPO;Art. 53 ZPO;Art. 74 BGG;Art. 84 SchKG; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.