Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - ML/2019/240)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	ML/2019/240

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Kammer für Strafverfolgung und Konkurs

Kantonsgericht Entscheid ML/2019/240 vom 30.12.2019 (VD)

Date:	30.12.2019
Force of law:	-

Summary:	In a judgment of 30 December 2019, the Cour des poursuites et faillites ruled that an appeal against a decision to lift the objection in a debt enforcement operation was not sufficiently substantiated and was therefore dismissed. The applicant had not explained why the decision of the first judge was wrong, and thus did not meet the requirements for sufficient justification in accordance with Article 321 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In addition, it was found that the procedural rules were not violated when the judge asked the applicant to consult a lawyer, and that the applicant was unsuccessful with his accusation that the judge had not decided the issue of legal fees during the trial. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible and the verdict will be issued at no cost.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 BGG;Art. 104 ZPO;Art. 321 ZPO;Art. 56 ZPO;Art. 74 BGG;Art. 82 SchKG;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.