Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2020/8)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Jug/2020/8

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2020/8 vom 12.12.2019 (VD)

Date:	12.12.2019
Force of law:	-

Summary:	A man named A.X.________ has requested a revision of the verdict of September 6, 2013, in which he was convicted of various crimes. He argues that he was not in possession of a firearm and that the occupants of the Mercedes involved in the incident were armed. He presents various pieces of evidence, including witness statements and the possibility of blank cartridges. However, the court decision declares that the arguments put forward are not enough to shake the original findings, and therefore the request for revision is rejected as inadmissible. The court costs are imposed on a.x.________.
Rule of Law:	Art. 385 StPo;Art. 388 StPo;Art. 410 StPo;Art. 411 StPo;Art. 412 StPo;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.