Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2020/214)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Jug/2020/214

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2020/214 vom 02.06.2020 (VD)

Date:	02.06.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The Cantonal Court of the Canton of Vaud has confirmed the judgment of the District Court of the Vaudois East of December 4, 2019. M.________ was convicted of fraud, bankruptcy and forgery of documents, as well as disobedience to an official order. He was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months, of which two years and six months are conditional. In addition, he was fined 200,000 francs. M.________ must also bear the costs of the procedure. More detailed summary: On 2 June 2020, the Cantonal Court of the Canton of Vaud confirmed the judgment of the District Court of the Vaud Eastern District Court of 4 December 2019. M.________ was convicted of fraud, bankruptcy and forgery of documents, as well as disobedience to an official order. He was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months, of which two years and six months are conditional. In addition, he was fined 200,000 francs. M.________ must also bear the costs of the procedure. The prosecution had demanded a prison sentence of four years and a fine of 300,000 francs. The defense, on the other hand, had pleaded for acquittal. M.________ had founded a company in 2017 that dealt with the brokerage of real estate. He sold several properties, but he did not own them. The buyers paid the purchase price, but did not receive any property. M.________ also had debts of several million francs. He refused to pay them and filed for bankruptcy proceedings. The Cantonal Court considers that M.________ committed the acts as he is accused of. It therefore upheld the district Court's ruling.
Rule of Law:	Art. 10 StPo;Art. 135 StPo;Art. 371 StPo;Art. 389 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 398 StPo;Art. 399 StPo;Art. 537 ZGB;Art. 66a StGB;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.