| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | Jug/2020/203 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel pénale |
| Date: | 26.05.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The Federal Supreme Court confirmed the verdict of the Cantonal Court, according to which A.A.________ was acquitted of the charge of property damage. A.A.________ had damaged a TV in a shopping center in Yverdon-les-Bains in 2019. The Cantonal Court had found that A.A.________ was not guilty, as he was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the crime. The Federal Court confirmed this finding and dismissed the prosecutor's appeal. More detailed summary: A.A._______ was acquitted of the charge of property damage by the Cantonal Court of the Canton of Vaud in 2019. He had damaged a television in a shopping center in Yverdon-les-Bains. The Cantonal Court had found that A.A.________ was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the crime and was therefore not guilty. The public prosecutor's office appealed against this verdict to the Federal Court. She argued that even with a mental illness, A.A.________ would have had the opportunity to realize that his behavior was wrong. The Federal Court dismissed the prosecutor's complaint. It confirmed the finding of the Cantonal Court that A.A.________ was not guilty at the time of the crime. The court stated that A.A.________ was unable to understand the consequences of his actions due to his mental illness. The judgment of the Federal Court is final. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 135 StPo;Art. 28b ZGB;Art. 382 StPo;Art. 389 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 398 StPo; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.