Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2020/200)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Jug/2020/200

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2020/200 vom 18.05.2020 (VD)

Date:	18.05.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	Five-sentence summary: On May 18, 2020, the Court of Appeal in Lausanne confirmed the appeal of defendant N.________ against a verdict of the Criminal Court. N.________ was sentenced to three years imprisonment for fraud in several cases. The appeal was unfounded. More detailed summary: The Court of Appeal confirmed the findings of the Criminal Court that N.________ in several cases created fake invoices and submitted them to various companies. As a result, he has incurred a total loss of CHF 100,000. The Court of Appeal confirmed the imprisonment of three years, as it was appropriate to deter N.________ and to make amends for the damages. More details: The parties were: N.________, the defendant, represented by a public defender The Cantonal Criminal Court, which had issued the judgment D.________, Y.________ SA, B.________ SA and V.________, the injured parties The charges were for fraud in several cases The Criminal Court had sentenced N.________ to a prison sentence of three years The defendant's appeal was unfounded Alternative: The Court of Appeal has dismissed the defendant's appeal against a verdict of the criminal Court. N.________ was sentenced to three years imprisonment for fraud in several cases. The Court of Appeal has confirmed the findings of the Criminal Court. The appeal was unfounded. Which summary is the right one? The correct summary depends on how much detailing is desired. The first summary is the shortest and provides the most important information. The second summary is more detailed and contains additional information, such as the names of the parties and the indictment. The third summary is even more detailed and contains a brief summary of the findings of the criminal court. Which summary is best suited for your purposes? If you need only the most important information, the first summary will be enough. If you want more detailing, the second or third summary is more suitable. The choice of the right abstract also depends on who the abstract is intended for. A summary for legal professionals should be more detailed than a summary for non-professionals.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 115 CPP;Art. 3 CPP;Art. 325 CPP;Art. 344 CPP;Art. 350 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 389 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 398 CPP;Art. 399 CPP;Art. 9 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Gasser, Rickli, Schweizer, éd., Art. 95; Art. 184 ZPO, 2014

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.