| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | Jug/2020/155 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel pénale |
| Date: | 14.04.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The President of the Criminal Court discussed the appeal proceedings of X.________ and the joint appeal of the Prosecutor of the District of Est vaudois against the verdict of the District Criminal Court of Est vaudois of July 18, 2019. X.________ was found guilty of a simple violation of traffic rules and sentenced to a fine of 450 CHF. He appealed, demanding an amendment to the verdict, as well as adequate compensation for his defense costs. The prosecutor demanded a higher fine. It was established that X.________ has already been convicted of similar offenses in the past. The court decided that the prosecutor's appeal is admissible and dismissed the applications of X.________. The amount of court costs was determined, and the losing party was male. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 LTF;Art. 130 CPP;Art. 3 OCR;Art. 31 LCR;Art. 334 CPP;Art. 353 CPP;Art. 354 CPP;Art. 355 CPP;Art. 356 CPP;Art. 357 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 398 CPP;Art. 406 CPP;Art. 429 CPP;Art. 442 CPP;Art. 85 CPP;Art. 90 LCR;Art. 97 LTF; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Schmid, Schweizer, Pitteloud, Jositsch, Riklin, Praxis éd., Art. 334; Art. 357 StPO, 2018 Spühler, Basler Kommentar zur ZPO, Art. 321 ZPO ; Art. 311 ZPO, 2017 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.