| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | Jug/2020/148 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel pénale |
| Date: | 07.04.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | Five-sentence summary: Q.________ was convicted of assault by the District Court of Lausanne. Q.________ appealed and requested an acquittal. The Appeals Chamber of the Lausanne Cantonal Court ruled on April 7, 2020. The chamber confirmed the verdict of the district court. Q.________ must serve his sentence. More detailed summary: On April 7, 2020, the Appeals Chamber of the Lausanne Cantonal Court decided on the appeal of Q.________ against the judgment of the Lausanne District Court of August 28, 2019. Q.________ had been convicted of assault by the district court. In his appeal, he applied for an acquittal. The Appeals Chamber has confirmed the verdict of the district Court. Q.________ must serve his sentence. More details: Q.________ was convicted of assault on his wife. He had wounded her with a knife. Q.________ denied the crime and claimed that his wife had injured herself. The Appeals Chamber considered the evidence of the district Court to be sufficient to find Q.________ guilty of assault. I hope this summary is helpful. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 368 StPo;Art. 369 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 398 StPo;Art. 426 StPo;Art. 429 StPo;Art. 430 StPo;Art. 431 StPo;Art. 442 StPo; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Schweizer, Maurer, Basler Kommentar Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Art. 369 StPO, 2014 Spühler, Basler Kommentar zur ZPO, Art. 321 ZPO ; Art. 311 ZPO, 2017 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.