Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2020/141)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Jug/2020/141

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2020/141 vom 08.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	08.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	K.________, who was convicted of rape, requests the revision of the verdict. The Cour dappel pénale will decide on April 8, 2020 that the application is admissible. The revision is pending and will be negotiated in a public meeting. The Cour dappel pénale will issue a judgment confirming or annulling the original judgment. The decision will be published in the next few months. (43 Words) Explanation: In the first sentence, the main statement of the text is summarized: K.________ requests the revision of a verdict that convicted him of rape. The second sentence explains the next step in the procedure: the Cour dappel pénale decides whether the application is admissible. The third sentence outlines the further course of the proceedings: the revision is pending and negotiated in a public meeting. In the fourth sentence, the outcome of the proceedings is indicated: the Cour dappel pénale will issue a verdict confirming or annulling the original verdict. In the fifth sentence, the time of publication of the verdict is indicated: the decision will be published in the coming months. Alternative Summary: The Cour dappel pénale decides that the revision of the judgment against K.________ is admissible. (17 Words) This summary is shorter and contains fewer details. It focuses on the most important information, namely the decision of the Cour dappel pénale.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 132 CPP;Art. 412 CPP;Art. 413 CPP;Art. 94 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Koller, Basler Kommentar Strafrecht I, Art. 77, 2019

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.