Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2020/116)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Jug/2020/116

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2020/116 vom 24.02.2020 (VD)

Date:	24.02.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	E.________ Sàrl sued A.B._______, B.B.________ and C.B.________ for the registration of a legal craftsman and entrepreneur mortgage on their property, because they had not paid their invoice for the work done. The court of first instance ruled in favor of E.________ Sàrl and the defendants appealed. The Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the first instance, as it found that E.________ Sàrl had fulfilled its contractual obligations and the arguments of the appeal were not convincing. The defendants must bear the court costs.
Rule of Law:	Art. 10 CPP;Art. 100 LTF;Art. 139 CPP;Art. 389 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 398 CPP;Art. 399 CPP;Art. 428 CPP;Art. 429 CPP;Art. 433 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Schweizer, Eugster, Basler Kommentar Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung, Art. 398 StPO, 2014 Spühler, Basler Kommentar zur ZPO, Art. 321 ZPO ; Art. 311 ZPO, 2017

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.