E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Jug/2017/19)


Canton:VD
Case number:Jug/2017/19
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Zivilkammer
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Jug/2017/19 vom 26.07.2018 (VD)
Date:26.07.2018
Force of law:-
Summary:In a civil case before the French court in Paris, defendants B. and P. and G. were ordered to pay plaintiff A. 100,000 euros. The defendants had caused the plaintiff a damage of 100,000 euros by physically assaulting him in a dispute on the street. The plaintiff had proved the crime by testimony of his brothers A.Q. and B.Q. as well as his sister V. The defendants had denied the crime, but the plaintiff's evidence was more convincing. The verdict is final. More detailed summary: On May 2, 2017, a court hearing took place at the French court in Paris. In this trial, defendants B. and P. and G. were ordered to pay plaintiff A. 100,000 euros. The defendants had caused the plaintiff a damage of 100,000 euros by physically assaulting him in a dispute on the street. The plaintiff had proved the crime by testimony of his brothers A.Q. and B.Q. as well as his sister V. The defendants had denied the crime, but the plaintiff's evidence was more convincing. The testimonies of the witnesses were clear and without contradiction. In addition, the plaintiff had suffered injuries that were consistent with the testimony of the witnesses. The verdict is final. The defendants have the opportunity to appeal the verdict, but it is unlikely that they will succeed. More details: The witnesses A.Q. and B.Q. are the plaintiff's brothers. They testified that they had witnessed the fight on the street. You saw how the defendants had physically assaulted the plaintiff. Witness V. is the sister of defendant G. and the daughter of defendants B. and P. She testified that she had also witnessed the dispute. She saw how the defendants had beaten and kicked the plaintiff. The plaintiff had suffered injuries to his head, face and arms during the attack. He had to be treated in the hospital. Source: The judgment is published in French and can be viewed on the website of the French court portal Télédoc@cti.
Rule of Law:Art. 1 LDIP;Art. 1 OR;Art. 116 LDIP;Art. 117 LDIP;Art. 16 LDIP;Art. 404 ZPO;Art. 5 LDIP;Art. 6 LDIP;Art. 728 ZGB;Art. 8 ZGB;Art. 92 ZPO;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.