| Summary: | The company N.________ was compulsorily affiliated with the S._________-Fondation collective for occupational pension provision from September 1, 2009.
However, the company N.________ did not pay all contributions for its employees.
The Fondation S._______ demanded from the company N.________ the additional payment of the contributions.
The Federal Supreme Court granted the Foundation S.________ right and obliged the company N.________ to make additional payments of the contributions.
The company N.________ must also pay interest to the Fondation S.________ for the late payments.
Detailed summary:
From September 1, 2009, the company N.________ was compulsorily affiliated with the Fondation S.________-Fondation collective for occupational pension provision. However, the company N.________ did not pay all contributions for its employees. The Fondation S._______ demanded from the company N.________ the additional payment of the contributions.
The Federal Supreme Court granted the Foundation S.________ right and obliged the company N.________ to make additional payments of the contributions. The company N.________ must also pay interest to the Fondation S.________ for the late payments.
Justification of the judgment:
The Federal Court justified its ruling by stating that the company N.________ is obliged to pay the contributions for its employees in the occupational pension scheme. The company N.________ has not fulfilled this obligation, which is why it is obliged to make additional payments of contributions.
Consequences of the verdict:
The Federal Court's ruling has the consequence that the company N.________ must pay the contributions for its employees in the occupational pension scheme. The company N.________ must also pay interest for the late payments. |