| Summary: | On October 11, 2012, the Aachen Regional Court ruled in a civil case that plaintiff H.________ must oblige defendant M.________ to pay damages in the amount of 50,000 euros.
H.________ had accused M.________ of insulting and threatening her in an argument.
M.________ had denied the allegations.
The court came to the conclusion that the claim is well-founded and M.________ H.________ actually insulted and threatened.
M.________ must now bear the costs of the legal dispute.
More detailed summary
The plaintiff H.________ and the defendant M.________ were neighbors in Aachen. On July 20, 2012, a dispute arose between them, in which M.________ H.________ is said to have insulted and threatened.
H.________ sued M.________ for damages in the amount of 50,000 euros. She claimed that she had suffered psychological damage as a result of the insults and threats.
M.________ denied the allegations and claimed that he had expressed himself only in self-defense.
The court concluded that the claim is well-founded. It established that M.________ H.________ actually insulted and threatened. The insults consisted in the fact that M.________ called H.________ as an old woman and a slut. The threats consisted in the fact that M.________ H.________ threatened to slay her.
The court therefore sentenced M.________ to damages in the amount of 50,000 euros. M.________ must now also bear the costs of the legal dispute. |