Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2020/54)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	HC/2020/54

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel civile

Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2020/54 vom 05.02.2020 (VD)

Date:	05.02.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The Cour d'appel civile rejected the appeal procedure and confirmed the decision of the first judge. The appellant had requested to change his visitation rights for his children, based on the statements of a psychologist. However, the court decided that the reasons put forward were not enough to change the agreement reached between the parties. The appellant was asked to start serious psychotherapy with a psychiatrist. The court fees were imposed on the appellant, since he is inferior. Neither party has been asked to reimburse any costs. The verdict is final and can be appealed in the Federal Court.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 BGG;Art. 106 ZPO;Art. 179 ZGB;Art. 271 ZPO;Art. 272 ZPO;Art. 276 ZPO;Art. 296 ZPO;Art. 308 ZPO;Art. 310 ZPO;Art. 311 ZPO;Art. 312 ZPO;Art. 314 ZPO;Art. 57 ZPO;Art. 74 BGG;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.