Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2020/379)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	HC/2020/379

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel civile

Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2020/379 vom 03.06.2020 (VD)

Date:	03.06.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The civil Court rejected the applications of G.P. and B.P. for the adoption of protective measures for the marital union. The grounds of appeal of the two parties were not sufficiently substantiated. The court found that there was no danger to the conjugal community. The parties were obliged to bear the costs of the proceedings. The verdict is final. More detailed summary: The spouses G.P. and B.P. quarreled over the marital union. G.P. applied for the adoption of protective measures because she felt threatened by B.P. B.P. applied for the adoption of protective measures, as he felt threatened by G.P. The civil Court rejected the applications of G.P. and B.P. The court concluded that the grounds of appeal of the two parties were not sufficiently substantiated. It established that there was no danger to the conjugal community. The parties were obliged to bear the costs of the proceedings. The verdict is final. Comment: The judgment is an important precedent for the jurisprudence on protective measures in the marital community. It shows that the courts place strict requirements on the justification of protective measures.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 105 CPC;Art. 109 CPC;Art. 123 CPC;Art. 241 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 95 CPC;Art. 96 CPC;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.