| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | HC/2020/370 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel civile |
| Date: | 03.06.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | U.________, an employee, sues her employer S.________ for payment of wages for overtime. The court of first instance dismisses the action. U.________ appeals. The Cantonal Court accepts the appeal and sentences S.________ to pay the overtime wage. The decision is final and final. More detailed summary: U.________, an employee at S.________, sues her employer for payment of wages for overtime. She claims that she regularly worked overtime in 2017 and 2018 without being compensated for it. The Court of First Instance dismisses the action because it considers that U.________ has not sufficiently demonstrated the overtime. U.________ appeals. The Cantonal Court accepts the appeal and sentences S.________ to pay the overtime wage. The court finds that U.________ has sufficiently proven the overtime. It also states that S.________ is obliged to record and document the working hours of its employees. The decision is final and final. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 LTF;Art. 13 LTr;Art. 157 CPC;Art. 2 LTr;Art. 224 CPC;Art. 3 LTr;Art. 308 CPC;Art. 310 CPC;Art. 311 CPC;Art. 3a LTr;Art. 7 OLT 1;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 86 CPC;Art. 9 OLT 1; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.