| Summary: | In this judgment, the Cantonal Court overturned the decision of the Civil Court of La Côte, according to which X.________SA was sentenced to pay T.________ CHF 10000. The Cantonal Court found that X.________SA is not guilty, since K.________, the plaintiff, could not be identified.
Here is a
The Cantonal Court overturned the decision of the Civil Court, according to which X.________SA was convicted.
The Cantonal Court found that X.________SA is not guilty.
The reason for this is that K.________, the plaintiff, could not be identified.
The claim of T.________, the defendant, was dismissed.
The verdict is final.
Here is another possible summary:
X.________SA was acquitted by the Cantonal Court of the payment of CHF 10000 to T.________.
The court found that K.________, the plaintiff, could not be identified, and therefore X.________SA is not guilty.
The verdict is final.
I hope this is helpful. |
| Comment: | Siffert, Turin, HandKommentar Handelsregisterverordnung, Art.165 HRegV, 2013 |