E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2020/317)


Canton:VD
Case number:HC/2020/317
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Cour d'appel civile
Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2020/317 vom 03.06.2020 (VD)
Date:03.06.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:In five movements: An employee (G.) has been terminated by his employer (K.). G. sued for reinstatement, which was awarded to him by the Labor Court. K. appealed the verdict. The Cantonal Court confirmed the ruling of the Labour Court. G. has been reinstated. More detailed summary: G. was employed by K. as a warehouse clerk. On July 1, 2019, he was terminated by K. G. sued for reinstatement and received a right from the Labor Court. K. appealed the verdict. The Cantonal Court confirmed the ruling of the Labour Court. The court concluded that G.'s dismissal was unjustified. K. had not terminated G. in due time and had not put forward any reasons for termination that would have justified the termination. G. was then reinstated at K.'s. More details: G. has been employed by K. as a warehouse clerk since July 1, 2015. K. announced G. on July 1, 2019 with a three-month deadline of September 30, 2019. G. argued that the dismissal was unjustified, since he had not committed any violations of duty. K. argued that G. worked too slowly and that he quarreled with other employees. Legal documents: Articles 337c and 337d of the Swiss Code of Obligations (CO) regulate the termination of employment relationships. Article 157 of the Swiss Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) regulates the appeal against a judgment of the Labour Court.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 BGG;Art. 157 ZPO;Art. 308 ZPO;Art. 310 ZPO;Art. 311 ZPO;Art. 312 ZPO;Art. 317 ZPO;Art. 57 ZPO;Art. 74 BGG;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.