| Summary: | On May 4, 2020, the Federal Court ruled that a woman who was coerced by her ex-partner to give him money can recover this amount.
The woman had lent the man 100,000 francs in a crisis. When she demanded the money back, the man threatened her with violence.
The federal court has ruled that the woman can claim back the 100,000 francs, even if she gave the money voluntarily.
The coercion of the man was an important reason for the recovery of the money.
The verdict is an important step for the protection of victims of violence.
More detailed summary:
The Federal Court ruled in a judgment on May 4, 2020 that a woman who was coerced by her ex-partner to give him money can recover this amount. The woman had lent the man 100,000 francs in a crisis. When she demanded the money back, the man threatened her with violence.
The federal court has ruled that the woman can claim back the 100,000 francs, even if she gave the money voluntarily. The coercion of the man was an important reason for the recovery of the money.
The verdict is an important step for the protection of victims of violence. It shows that even money that was given voluntarily can be recovered if it was given under duress.
More details:
In the judgment, the Federal Court found that the woman had given the 100,000 francs in a crisis and that the man had taken advantage of this crisis to force her. The man had threatened the woman with violence if she would not repay the money.
The federal court has ruled that the coercion of the man was an important reason for the recovery of the money. The woman had given the money in a situation where she could not defend herself.
The verdict is an important step for the protection of victims of violence. It shows that even money that was given voluntarily can be recovered if it was given under duress. |