E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2020/188)


Canton:VD
Case number:HC/2020/188
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours civile
Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2020/188 vom 03.03.2020 (VD)
Date:03.03.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:The owners of a building (a.b._______, b.B._______ and c.B._______) appealed against a decision of the Court of First Instance, which allowed the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage in favor of a company (e.________ Sàrl) on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the company and upheld the original decision. The court found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work performed, and it considered the documents proving payment by the subcontractor to be not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to pay the court costs.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 319 CPC;Art. 320 CPC;Art. 321 CPC;Art. 322 CPC;Art. 326 CPC;Art. 334 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.