Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2020/173)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	HC/2020/173

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Cour d'appel civile

Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2020/173 vom 17.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	17.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The judge M. Stoudmann decided on a case in which Z.________ appealed against a previous decision regarding the preliminary measures regarding the care of children T._________ and K.________. The judge has determined that there are no significant new facts that would justify a change. He has decided that Z.________ must continue to make alimony contributions and that the situation of the children must be taken into account. The court costs were divided up, whereby e.g.________ has to bear a large part. The judge's decision was appealed by J.________, but the court rejected the appeal. The cost of the procedure was also divided.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 106 CPC;Art. 123 CPC;Art. 176 CC;Art. 179 CC;Art. 261 CPC;Art. 276 CPC;Art. 296 CPC;Art. 308 CPC;Art. 310 CPC;Art. 314 CPC;Art. 317 CPC;Art. 57 CPC;Art. 58 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 92 CPC;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.