| Summary: | Summary: In the present case, it was a dispute between U.________ and O.________ regarding a decision of the Shareholders' Meeting of June 28, 2019, in which a reduction and simultaneous increase in the share capital was decided. U._______ appealed, arguing that she, as the sole heiress of K.________, was entitled to annul the decisions. The judge ruled that U.________ had not made it credible to be the sole heiress, but this was later confirmed. The judge also held that the 'coup d'accordéon` measure to rehabilitate the company was justified. The court costs were CHF XXX. |