| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | HC/2020/135 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel civile |
| Date: | 26.02.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The owners of one building (A.B._______, B.B._______ and C.B._______) appealed the decision of the Court of First instance. This had granted a company (e.________ Sàrl) the registration of a legal craftsman mortgage on their property. The owners argued that the company did not prove that it actually carried out work and that the subcontractor paid the bill. However, the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the company and upheld the original decision. The court found that the company had provided sufficient evidence of the work done. The documents that were supposed to prove the payment by the subcontractor were considered by the court as not credible. The appeal of the owners was rejected, and they had to bear the court costs of the appeal proceedings. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 241 ZPO;Art. 287 ZGB;Art. 74 BGG; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.