| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | HC/2019/1142 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Cour d'appel civile |
| Date: | 14.02.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The court ruling concerns a dispute between two parties regarding a renovation of a property owner's electrical installation. The plaintiff demands a payment of CHF 12,757 from the defendant for the replacement of defective lighting. The court decides that the work has been completed and the plant has been delivered, since the lighting has been used since 2011, and dismisses the lawsuit. The plaintiff failed to report defects in a timely manner, which is why the defendant is not obliged to pay. The court costs and attorney's fees are imposed on the plaintiff. The verdict can be appealed in the Federal Court. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 BGG;Art. 106 ZPO;Art. 111 ZPO;Art. 2 ZGB;Art. 310 ZPO;Art. 311 ZPO;Art. 313 ZPO;Art. 57 ZPO;Art. 74 BGG;Art. 80 SchKG; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | Schott, Basler Kommentar éd., Art. 370, 2020 Spühler, Basler Kommentar zur ZPO, Art. 321 ZPO ; Art. 311 ZPO, 2017 |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.