Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2015/26)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	HC/2015/26

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours civile

Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2015/26 vom 05.02.2015 (VD)

Date:	05.02.2015
Force of law:	-

Summary:	A.U. and B.U., the tenants of an apartment in Vevey, are striving to reduce the legal fees of their public defender. The Cantonal Court considers the lawyer's fees to be reasonable and rejects the appeal. The tenants had filed a lawsuit against their landlord before the Tribunal des baux. The Tribunal des baux had assigned a public defender to the tenants. The tenants argue that the public defender spent too much time on the case. The Cantonal Court considers the tenants' appeal to be unfounded. It considers that the legal fees are reasonable. The tenants have to pay the legal fees in full. (49 Words) Alternative: A.U. and B.U. must pay the legal fees of their public defender in full. The Cantonal Court considers the costs to be reasonable, as the public defender had to clarify a complex legal situation. (39 Words) Which summary is better depends on the context. The first summary is shorter and contains the most important information. The second summary is more detailed and explains why the Cantonal Court rejected the tenants' appeal.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 110 CPC;Art. 119 CPC;Art. 122 CPC;Art. 123 CPC;Art. 221 CPC;Art. 311 CPC;Art. 319 CPC;Art. 321 CPC;Art. 64 LTF;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 95 CPC;Art. 96 CPC;Art. 97 LTF;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.