Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - HC/2011/667)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	HC/2011/667

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Rekurskammer II

Kantonsgericht Entscheid HC/2011/667 vom 19.01.2012 (VD)

Date:	19.01.2012
Force of law:	-

Summary:	On 20 July 2010, the Chambre des recours of the Tribunal cantonal vaudois decided on two appeals against a judgment of the Tribunal darrondissement de La Côte. B.R., the defendant, had appealed against the assignment of a common child to the plaintiff A.R. A.R., in turn, had filed a complaint against the amount of the child support contribution. The Chambre des recours rejected B.R.'s complaint and partially approved A.R.'s complaint. The decision is not yet final. (48 Words) Explanation: The first sentence reflects the most important point of the text: the Chambre des recours has decided on two complaints. The second sentence names the parties and the courts that were involved. The third sentence summarizes the two complaints. The fourth sentence contains the result of the decisions. The fifth sentence indicates that the decisions are not yet final. Alternative: On July 20, 2010, the Chambre des recours of the Cantonal vaudois Tribunal ruled that a common child should be assigned to the plaintiff A.R. The amount of the child support contribution was reduced from CHF 3,000 to CHF 2,500. (32 Words) Explanation: This summary contains only the most important information of the text. The first sentence contains the result of the decision on the assignment of the child. The second sentence contains the result of the decision on the contribution to alimony. Which summary is better? The choice of the summary depends on what the reader wants to know. The first summary is more detailed and contains more information. The second summary is shorter and contains only the most important information.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 277 CC;Art. 404 CPC;Art. 74 LTF;Art. 91 CPC;Art. 92 CPC;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.