E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/56)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/56
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/56 vom 05.12.2019 (VD)
Date:05.12.2019
Force of law:-
Summary:The Municipality of K._______ has appealed against the decision of the District Attorney of Lausanne of October 18, 2019 regarding a complaint by D.________ about an alleged fraud in the sale of a garden plot and a garden hut to X.________. The prosecutor refused to recognize the municipality as the injured party, as it was not directly affected by the alleged crime. The appeal was rejected, since the municipality was not considered an injured party. It was found that the municipality does not hold the protected rights of the relevant offense. The costs of the procedure were imposed on the municipality.
Rule of Law:Art. 105 StPo;Art. 115 StPo;Art. 382 StPo;Art. 385 StPo;Art. 390 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 422 StPo;Art. 428 StPo;Art. 677 ZGB;Art. 933 ZGB;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.