E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/478)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/478
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/478 vom 19.06.2020 (VD)
Date:19.06.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:I.________ was arrested on June 14, 2019 by the Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Strada on suspicion of drug trafficking and other offenses. On June 24, 2019, he was remanded in custody. On 12 June 2020, the Compulsory Measures Court extended the pre-trial detention by three months. I.________ filed an appeal against this decision. The Federal Court dismissed the appeal, considering that the pre-trial detention was justified. More detailed summary: I.________ was arrested by the Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Strada on June 14, 2019, after being found in a car with drugs and weapons. On June 24, 2019, he was remanded in custody. The public prosecutor's office requested an extension of the pre-trial detention for three months, which was approved by the Forced Measures Court on June 12, 2020. I.________ filed an appeal against this decision. He argued that the pre-trial detention was not justified, since he did not pose a threat of escape, and also did not cooperate with the police. The Federal Court dismissed the appeal. It was determined that I.________ posed a flight risk, as he could be staying abroad. In addition, he could destroy evidence or influence witnesses upon his release. The Federal Supreme Court emphasized that pre-trial detention is a serious interference with personal freedom, but also an important means of solving crimes. In this case, the pre-trial detention was justified in order not to jeopardize the investigation.
Rule of Law:Art. 212 StPo;Art. 221 StPo;Art. 382 StPo;Art. 385 StPo;Art. 390 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 428 StPo;Art. 91 StPo;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.