| Summary: | Five sentences summarizing the judgment of June 11, 2020 of the Federal Supreme Court:
The Federal Court has approved the appeal against a search warrant for W.________.
The search warrant was disproportionate because it unlawfully invaded the privacy of W.________.
The Federal Supreme Court quashed the search warrant and remitted the case to the cantonal Court.
W.________ must bear the costs of the procedure.
The verdict is final.
More detailed summary:
W.________ was suspected by the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Vaud of being in possession of child pornography. On March 10, 2020, the prosecutor's office issued a search warrant for the apartment of W.________. W._______ filed a complaint against the search warrant with the Federal Court, as he considered that the search warrant was disproportionate.
The Federal Court granted the appeal of W.________. The Federal Court found that the search warrant was disproportionate because it unlawfully encroached on the privacy of W.________. The search warrant was not based on concrete suspicions, but was based only on a general suspicion. In addition, the search warrant was too broad, as it also allowed the search of electronic devices that were not related to the suspicion.
The Federal Court lifted the search warrant and referred the matter back to the Cantonal Court. The Cantonal Court must now decide whether to continue the investigation against W.________ on the basis of other evidence.
W.________ must bear the costs of the procedure. The verdict is final. |