| Canton: | VD |
| Case number: | Entscheid/2020/426 |
| Instance: | Kantonsgericht |
| Department: | Chambre des recours pénale |
| Date: | 13.05.2020 |
| Force of law: | - |
| Summary: | The Criminal Chamber has approved the appeal of the company Z.________ Sàrl against two administrative penalties of the Yverdon-les-Bains Police Commission. The company Z.________ Sàrl was fined by the Police Commission for noise pollution with two administrative fines of CHF 1000 each.- occupied. The criminal chamber has lifted the administrative penalties, as the noise pollution was not demonstrable. The company Z.________ Sàrl does not have to pay the administrative penalties. The Yverdon-les-Bains Police Commission has unfairly punished the company Z.________ Sàrl. Explaination: In the first two sentences, the verdict is briefly summarized. The following two sentences explain the reasons for the judgment. In the last sentence, the verdict is summarized and a conclusion is drawn. Alternative Summary: The Criminal Chamber has acquitted the company Z.________ Sàrl of two administrative penalties for noise pollution. The noise pollution was not demonstrable, as the police commission could not provide sufficient evidence. Explaination: This summary is a little more concise, but nevertheless correct in content. She refrains from explaining the reasons for the verdict and focuses on the result. |
| Rule of Law: | Art. 100 LTF;Art. 258 CPC;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 395 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 89 CPP; |
| BGE reference:: | - |
| Comment: | - |
Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.
Click here to return to the page search engine.