| Summary: | X.________, a Swiss citizen convicted of drug trafficking, applied to the penitentiary Enforcement Authority (SVP) for early release. The SVP rejected the request because X.________ had not yet served half of his sentence. X.________ appealed, and the Chambre des recours pénale proved him right.
The Board noted that X.________ had made significant progress during his time in custody. He had followed the rules of the SVP and participated in drug therapy. In addition, he had found a job and planned to move into his own apartment after his dismissal.
The board concluded that X.________ was no longer at risk of relapse and that he met the requirements for early release.
Here is the summary in five sentences:
X.________, convicted drug trafficker, applies for early release.
SVP rejects application, as X.________ has not yet served half of the sentence.
X.________ appeals, and Chambre des recours pénale agrees with him.
Chamber annuls SVP decision because X.________ has made progress.
X.________ is released early.
I hope this is helpful. |