E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/384)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/384
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/384 vom 12.05.2020 (VD)
Date:12.05.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:X.________, a Swiss citizen convicted of drug trafficking, applied to the penitentiary Enforcement Authority (SVP) for early release. The SVP rejected the request because X.________ had not yet served half of his sentence. X.________ appealed, and the Chambre des recours pénale proved him right. The Board noted that X.________ had made significant progress during his time in custody. He had followed the rules of the SVP and participated in drug therapy. In addition, he had found a job and planned to move into his own apartment after his dismissal. The board concluded that X.________ was no longer at risk of relapse and that he met the requirements for early release. Here is the summary in five sentences: X.________, convicted drug trafficker, applies for early release. SVP rejects application, as X.________ has not yet served half of the sentence. X.________ appeals, and Chambre des recours pénale agrees with him. Chamber annuls SVP decision because X.________ has made progress. X.________ is released early. I hope this is helpful.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 318 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 91 CPP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.