E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/363)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/363
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/363 vom 06.05.2020 (VD)
Date:06.05.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:The defendant L.________ had appealed against a decision of the penitentiary service. He had applied for a permit to leave the detention centre, but was refused. The criminal chamber granted the appeal and annulled the decision of the penitentiary service. She found that the reasons for the refusal of the permit were not sufficient. The accused is now allowed to participate in an exit. More detailed summary: L.________ had been sentenced to two years' imprisonment for a crime. He applied to the penitentiary service for a permit for an exit from the detention center. The penitentiary service rejected the application, since L.________ had already escaped from the detention center several times without permission in the past. L.________ appealed against this decision. The criminal chamber granted the appeal and annulled the decision of the penitentiary service. The criminal chamber found that the reasons for the refusal of the permit were not sufficient. L.________ had repeatedly escaped from the detention centre without permission in the past, but he had now behaved properly in the detention centre. In addition, the requested exit had only been planned for a period of a few hours. The Criminal Chamber obliged the penitentiary service to grant L.________'s request for an exit permit.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 423 CPP;
BGE reference::-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.