Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/353)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/353

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/353 vom 27.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	27.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	The Chambre des recours pénale has decided on an objection by X.__ against two fines issued by the Préfète of the district of Aigle. X.__ was accused of exceeding the speed limit on the A9 highway. The court rejected the appointment of a public defender and decided that the court costs of CHF 200 are to be borne by X.__. X.__ then filed a complaint with the Cantonal Tribunal, but it was rejected. The court ruled that X.__ is not entitled to a public defender, since the case is not complex, and the penalty is only a fine. The court also rejected X.__' application for suspension of the proceedings, since no connection with other ongoing proceedings was proved. The court rejected the appeal of X.__ and upheld the decision of the Tribunal de police.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 130 CPP;Art. 132 CPP;Art. 136 CPP;Art. 314 CPP;Art. 329 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 89 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	Spühler, Schweizer, Basler Kommentar Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung, Art. 319 ZPO, 2017

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.