Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/275)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/275

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/275 vom 03.04.2020 (VD)

Date:	03.04.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	Five-sentence summary: On 3 April 2020, the Chambre des Recours pénale of the Canton of Vaud overturned the judgment of the Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois of 28 January 2020. Defendant Q.________ had been convicted of violating the Road Traffic Act because he was driving at an excessive speed in a 30-speed zone. The Chambre des Recours pénale concluded that the evidence of the defendant's guilt was insufficient. Detailed summary: Q.________ was convicted by the Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois for violating the Road Traffic Act. He had been traveling at an excessive speed in a 30-speed zone. The Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois imposed a fine of CHF 1000 and a withdrawal of the driver's license for three months. Q.________ appealed against the judgment. The Chambre des Recours pénale concluded that the evidence of the defendant's guilt was insufficient. The Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois had relied on the testimony of a police officer who had measured the defendant with excessive speed. However, the Chambre des Recours pénale concluded that the police officer's statement was not credible. The Chambre des Recours pénale overturned the verdict of the Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois and remitted the case to the Tribunal de police de larrondissement de la Broye et du Nord vaudois for re-evaluation. Explanations of the five sentences: First sentence:indication of the date, court and decision. Second sentence:indication of the outcome of the proceedings. Third sentence:Presentation of the procedural act. Fourth movement:Presentation of the decision of the Chambre des Recours pénale. Fifth sentence:indication of the consequences of the decision.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 353 CPP;Art. 354 CPP;Art. 356 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 85 CPP;Art. 89 CPP;Art. 90 CPP;Art. 91 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:	-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.