E-MailWeiterleiten
LinkedInLinkedIn

Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/257)


Canton:VD
Case number:Entscheid/2020/257
Instance:Kantonsgericht
Department:Chambre des recours pénale
Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/257 vom 01.04.2020 (VD)
Date:01.04.2020
Force of law:-
Summary:Summary: The Federal Court confirms the order of a temporary asset arrest against H., who is being investigated on suspicion of fraud. The arrest serves to secure a possible fine or a claim for damages. The arrest was legally ordered because the requirements of Art. 263 para. 1 lit. c and d StPO are satisfied. H. has not put forward sufficient reasons that speak against the arrest. The arrest is therefore justified. Five sentences: The Federal Court confirms the asset arrest against H. on suspicion of fraud. The arrest serves to secure a possible penalty or claim for damages. The conditions of arrest are fulfilled. H. did not put forward any counterarguments. The arrest is therefore justified. Explaination: A. a) ainstruction pénaleistouvertecontre H.poursoupçondefraude. The Federal Court confirms the order of asset arrest against H., who is being investigated on suspicion of fraud. B.LeMinistere publicaordonéleséquestredetoutelafortunedeH. The arrest serves to secure a possible fine or a claim for damages. C.H.arecourucontrecetteordonnance. H. has appealed against the arrest. D.LaChambre des recours pénaleaexamennélerecoursetlejugefondé. The Federal Court examined the appeal and dismissed it. E.Leséquestreestdoncmaintenu. The arrest is therefore justified.
Rule of Law:Art. 100 LTF;Art. 197 CPP;Art. 263 CPP;Art. 267 CPP;Art. 382 CPP;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 396 CPP;Art. 418 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 428 CPP;Art. 433 CPP;Art. 436 CPP;Art. 793 CC;
BGE reference::-
Comment:
-

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.