Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/251)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/251

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/251 vom 06.03.2020 (VD)

Date:	06.03.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	Conclusion in 5 sentences: S.________ is accused of throwing an object at the car of O.________. O.________ has filed a complaint, but S.________ denies the fact. The prosecutor's office stopped the investigation, as it did not have enough evidence for an indictment. O.________ appealed against it, but the Appeals Chamber confirmed the cessation. O.________ can now apply to the Federal Court. More detailed summary: In a judgment of March 6, 2020, the Appeals Chamber of the Cantonal Court of Vaud confirmed the termination of the criminal proceedings against S.________ for property damage. S._______ is accused of throwing an object at O.________'s car on September 1, 2019. O.________ filed a complaint, but S.________ denies the fact. The prosecutor's office stopped the investigation, as it did not have enough evidence for an indictment. O.________ appealed against it, but the Appeals Chamber confirmed the cessation. O.________ can now apply to the Federal Court. Explaination: S.________ is accused of throwing an object at the car of O.________. The prosecutor's office accuses S._______ of throwing an object at O.________'s car. O.________ has filed a complaint and claims that S.________ is the culprit. O.________ has filed a complaint, but S.________ denies the fact. O.________ has filed a complaint and claims that S.________ is the culprit. S.________ denies the crime and claims that he is innocent. The prosecutor's office stopped the investigation, as it did not have enough evidence for an indictment. The prosecutor's office stopped the investigation, as it did not have enough evidence for an indictment. The prosecutor's office has not found any witnesses or evidence that would prove the guilt of S.________. O.________ appealed against it, but the Appeals Chamber confirmed the cessation. O.________ has appealed against the termination of the criminal case. The Appeals Chamber has confirmed the hiring and decided that there is not enough evidence for an indictment. O.________ can now apply to the Federal Court. O.________ can now apply to the Federal Court. The Federal Supreme Court is the highest instance in Switzerland and can decide on the decision of the Appellate Chamber.
Rule of Law:	Art. 100 LTF;Art. 107 CPP;Art. 118 CPP;Art. 385 CPP;Art. 390 CPP;Art. 422 CPP;Art. 428 CPP;Art. 9 CC;Art. 94 CPP;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.