| Summary: | The Federal Supreme Court has overturned a decision by the Office dexécution des peines (OEP), which had refused to release a prisoner on parole.
The detainee had been convicted of an offense against the federal Law on the prohibition of the groups Al-Qaïda and Islamic State.
The Federal Court found that the OEP's prediction that the inmate would become a criminal again was not sufficiently substantiated.
The federal court released the detainee on parole under conditions.
The detainee must continue to undergo outpatient therapy and must not have contact with extremist organizations.
More detailed summary
On March 27, 2020, the Federal Supreme Court overturned a decision of the OEP that had refused to release a prisoner on parole. The detainee had been convicted of an offense against the federal Law on the prohibition of the groups Al-Qaïda and Islamic State.
The Federal Court found that the OEP's prediction that the inmate would become a criminal again was not sufficiently substantiated. The OEP had relied on the existence of risk factors such as an extremist attitude and a lack of integration. However, the Federal Court held that the prisoner had shown a positive development during his time in custody and had actively participated in therapy.
The federal court released the detainee on parole under conditions. The detainee must continue to undergo outpatient therapy and must not have contact with extremist organizations.
Explaination
The detainee was sentenced to 18 months in prison in 2018 for an offense against the federal Law banning the groups Al-Qaïda and Islamic State. The sentence was suspended for probation.
In 2020, the detainee applied for early release from the probation period. The OEP rejected the application, as it assumed that the prisoner would become a criminal again.
The Federal Supreme Court has overturned the decision of the OEP. The court found that the OEP's forecast was not sufficiently substantiated.
The federal court released the detainee on parole under conditions. The detainee must continue to undergo outpatient therapy and must not have contact with extremist organizations.
Significance
The verdict of the Federal Court is an important step for improving the rehabilitation of offenders. The court has made it clear that the prognosis of a prisoner's risk of relapse must be based not on mere risk factors, but on a comprehensive assessment of the individual circumstances of the individual case. |