Jugement Kantonsgericht (VD - Entscheid/2020/194)

Canton:	VD
Case number:	Entscheid/2020/194

Instance:	Kantonsgericht
Department:	Chambre des recours pénale

Kantonsgericht Entscheid Entscheid/2020/194 vom 10.03.2020 (VD)

Date:	10.03.2020
Force of law:	-

Summary:	B.________ and X.________ have notified A.W.________ for damage to property. The prosecutor's office stopped the proceedings because it did not see sufficient evidence of a criminal offense. B.________ and X.________ have filed an appeal against the hiring. The Board of Appeal has annulled the termination of the proceedings and referred the proceedings back to the public prosecutor's office. The public prosecutor's office must now decide whether to put A.W.________ on trial. More detailed summary: B.________ and X.________ have reported A.W._________ for allegedly damaging their apartment. The prosecutor's office stopped the proceedings because it did not see sufficient evidence of a criminal offense. B.________ and X.________ have filed an appeal against the hiring. The Board of Appeal has annulled the termination of the proceedings and referred the proceedings back to the public prosecutor's office. The public prosecutor's office must now decide whether to put A.W.________ on trial. Explanation: The Board of Appeal has annulled the termination of the proceedings because it considers that the Public prosecutor's office has not sufficiently examined whether A.W.________ damaged the apartment. The public prosecutor's office must now re-examine the evidence and decide whether to bring A.W.________ to trial. More details: The Board of Appeal found that the Public Prosecutor's office had not taken sufficient account of the statements of B.________ and X.________. The Board of Appeal also noted that the prosecutor's office did not collect all possible evidence, for example, video recordings from the neighborhood. Follow: A.W.________ is now again suspected of having damaged the apartment of B.________ and X.________. A.W.________ must now prepare for a possible indictment and a court case.
Rule of Law:	Art. 385 StPo;Art. 396 StPo;Art. 397 StPo;Art. 423 StPo;Art. 433 StPo;Art. 436 StPo;Art. 5 StPo;Art. 6 VwVG;
BGE reference::	-
Comment:

Please note that there is no claim to topicality/accuracy/format and/or completeness and that therefore any guarantee is excluded. Original decisions may be ordered or made on the basis of the competent court.

Click here to return to the page search engine.